solved: Case Scenario 

Question Answered step-by-step Case Scenario A 16-year-old boy comes to clinic with chief complaint of sore throat for 3 days. Denies fever or chills. PMH negative for recurrent colds, influenza, ear infections or pneumonias. NKDA or food allergies. Physical exam reveals temp of 99.6 F, pulse 78 and regular with respirations of 18. HEENT normal with exception of reddened posterior pharynx with white exudate on tonsils that are enlarged to 3+. Positive anterior and posterior cervical adenopathy. Rapid strep test performed in office was positive. His HCP wrote a prescription for amoxicillin 500 mg po q 12 hours x 10 days disp #20. He took the first capsule when he got home and immediately complained of swelling of his tongue and lips, difficulty breathing with audible wheezing. 911 was called and he was taken to the hospital, where he received emergency treatment for his allergic reaction.  Questions to Address: The role genetics plays in the disease. Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described. The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred. The cells that are involved in this process. How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.    Sample Reference Cho, K. H., Port, G. C., & Caparon, M. (2019). Genetics of Group A Streptococci. Microbiology spectrum, 7(2), 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0056-2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0056-2018 McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.  Rubric for Discussion  Excellent Good Fair Poor  Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.  Supported by at least three current, credible sources.  Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.  At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.  Supported by at least three credible sources.  Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).  One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.  Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.  Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.  Post is cited with two credible sources.  Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.  Contains some APA formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately.  Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.  Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.  Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.  Contains only one or no credible sources.  Not written clearly or concisely.  Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.  Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.  Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.  Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives.  Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.  Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.  Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.  Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.  Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.  Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.  Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.  Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.  Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.  Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.  Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication.  Responses to faculty questions are missing.  No credible sources are cited. Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.  Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.  Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives.  Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.  Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.  Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.  Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.  Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.  Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.  Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.  Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.  Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.  Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.  Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication.  Responses to faculty questions are missing.  No credible sources are cited. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.  Health Science Science Nursing NURS 6501 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency